The Bishop's Pastoral Letter opens and ends with a question: Who is my Neighbour?
When the smart young lawyer asked this same question of Jesus, he was told a story and was asked a question.
Who was Neighbour to the man?
The one who showed mercy!
The pastoral letter is in fact addressed to parishioners in the parishes of the Church of England not the coalition Government or any of the political parties so if it has touched a conscience or tweaked a nerve in someone then their response is very telling.
But unless they are members of the Church of England then the letter is not addressed to them but it does offer some guidance to those who are as to how to think about the forthcoming election and those who are seeking their support.
The letter takes as its starting point a quotation from St Paul's letter to the Phillippians.
Whatever is true, whatever is honourable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
Phillippians 4:8
This text if applied to the current Government's policies and public statements acts as a Barium Meal, it is sharp, difficult to swallow and when it is examined under the right light reveals where the policies and statements are mistaken and where some of its rhetoric is deeply divisive, unpleasant and unnecessary.
The sentence highlighted in the first section of the report states that: As Bishops we support policies which respect the natural environment, enhance human dignity and honour the image of God in our neighbour.
I find it hard to take issue with such and unexceptional statement. It is anodyne, but it has clearly touched a nerve.
Images of David Cameron in his hoody hugging a husky and inviting us to vote blue and turn green spring immediately to mind. But admittedly there's little he can do, having along with previous administrations from Thatcher to Blair, sold most of our energy dependency to foreign owners, about the natural environment except to think you frack on and I'll frack off?
Perhaps the idea of the DWP employing sanctions to get couch potatoes off of their sofas and into work or GP's sending their sick and lame off to be independently reviewed after a month on the sick could be seen as enhancing human dignity?
And as for the image of God in our neighbour the guest list at the recent party held in support of election funding suggests a fairly limited view of what the Divine imagine might look like but like Moses on the mountain we were not invited to gaze too closely or for too long, especially those who entered by the back door so as to remain out of public view.
The document is clearly intended to promote a debate and it would seem appropriate for it to be on the agendas of church councils long before election day.
Not all church members will agree with some of what is said but it is not in fact proposing a programme or as the document states a list of policies of which the Bishops approve although treating people equally and fairly, as human beings not units of production, welcoming immigrants, staying in Europe rather than isolating ourselves as a nation, preferring a land based army to a costly nuclear defence system that (hopefully) will never be used just to keep our seat at the top table all seem to be policies that will appear in one manifesto and not in another.
That said the document makes two claims of the church in support of its right to contribute to the political discourse before the election.
That it has a presence in all communities through the parish system and that even despite the decline in attendance over recent years, the church still claims the loyal support of thousands of people who attend worship Sunday by Sunday.
Sadly both these claims are seriously undermined by reality.
Of course churches run food banks and the Archbishop has promoted credit unions but the parish system is facing a serious existential crisis, the real and present danger that it cannot be maintained and Bishops are the last remaining vestiges of a structure which has over the years lost its front line troops, whilst uniting parish after parish, under the somewhat misguided view that skeletons can still breed effectively.
But as the parishes amalgamate and hard working parish priests run from meeting to meeting in ever decreasing circles Bishops have retained their status and the rewards that go with it.
I once heard about a headline in a local newspaper referring to the appointment of a new area Bishop:
I am a socialist says new Bishop.
Reading the response of some Tory MP's it would have seemed that the right leaning newspapers might have carried a headline that said:
I am a bishop says new Socialist.
Sadly that is not the case. The document is a call to Christians to consider the question what kind of society do we wish to be?
A society of strangers or a community of communities?
This is of course an historic question that resonates with words we associate with another cleric the poet John Donne when he offered the idea in Meditation XVII, that we are interconnected, interrelated in our common humanity, that 'no man is an island'.
It's worth quoting:
The Church is Catholic, universal, so are all her actions; all that she does belongs to all. When she baptises a child, that action concerns me; for that child is thereby connected to that body which is my head too, and ingrafted into that body whereof I am a member. And when she buries a man, that action concerns me: all mankind is of one author, and is one volume; and when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and very chapter must be so translated; God employs several translators; some pieces are translated by age, some by sickness, some by war, some by justice; but God's hand is in every translation, and his hand shall bind up all our scattered leaves again for that library where every book shall lie open to one another.
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod is washed away by the sea, Europe is the less.
When the smart young lawyer asked this same question of Jesus, he was told a story and was asked a question.
Who was Neighbour to the man?
The one who showed mercy!
The pastoral letter is in fact addressed to parishioners in the parishes of the Church of England not the coalition Government or any of the political parties so if it has touched a conscience or tweaked a nerve in someone then their response is very telling.
But unless they are members of the Church of England then the letter is not addressed to them but it does offer some guidance to those who are as to how to think about the forthcoming election and those who are seeking their support.
The letter takes as its starting point a quotation from St Paul's letter to the Phillippians.
Whatever is true, whatever is honourable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
Phillippians 4:8
This text if applied to the current Government's policies and public statements acts as a Barium Meal, it is sharp, difficult to swallow and when it is examined under the right light reveals where the policies and statements are mistaken and where some of its rhetoric is deeply divisive, unpleasant and unnecessary.
The sentence highlighted in the first section of the report states that: As Bishops we support policies which respect the natural environment, enhance human dignity and honour the image of God in our neighbour.
I find it hard to take issue with such and unexceptional statement. It is anodyne, but it has clearly touched a nerve.
Images of David Cameron in his hoody hugging a husky and inviting us to vote blue and turn green spring immediately to mind. But admittedly there's little he can do, having along with previous administrations from Thatcher to Blair, sold most of our energy dependency to foreign owners, about the natural environment except to think you frack on and I'll frack off?
Perhaps the idea of the DWP employing sanctions to get couch potatoes off of their sofas and into work or GP's sending their sick and lame off to be independently reviewed after a month on the sick could be seen as enhancing human dignity?
And as for the image of God in our neighbour the guest list at the recent party held in support of election funding suggests a fairly limited view of what the Divine imagine might look like but like Moses on the mountain we were not invited to gaze too closely or for too long, especially those who entered by the back door so as to remain out of public view.
The document is clearly intended to promote a debate and it would seem appropriate for it to be on the agendas of church councils long before election day.
Not all church members will agree with some of what is said but it is not in fact proposing a programme or as the document states a list of policies of which the Bishops approve although treating people equally and fairly, as human beings not units of production, welcoming immigrants, staying in Europe rather than isolating ourselves as a nation, preferring a land based army to a costly nuclear defence system that (hopefully) will never be used just to keep our seat at the top table all seem to be policies that will appear in one manifesto and not in another.
That said the document makes two claims of the church in support of its right to contribute to the political discourse before the election.
That it has a presence in all communities through the parish system and that even despite the decline in attendance over recent years, the church still claims the loyal support of thousands of people who attend worship Sunday by Sunday.
Sadly both these claims are seriously undermined by reality.
Of course churches run food banks and the Archbishop has promoted credit unions but the parish system is facing a serious existential crisis, the real and present danger that it cannot be maintained and Bishops are the last remaining vestiges of a structure which has over the years lost its front line troops, whilst uniting parish after parish, under the somewhat misguided view that skeletons can still breed effectively.
But as the parishes amalgamate and hard working parish priests run from meeting to meeting in ever decreasing circles Bishops have retained their status and the rewards that go with it.
I once heard about a headline in a local newspaper referring to the appointment of a new area Bishop:
I am a socialist says new Bishop.
Reading the response of some Tory MP's it would have seemed that the right leaning newspapers might have carried a headline that said:
I am a bishop says new Socialist.
Sadly that is not the case. The document is a call to Christians to consider the question what kind of society do we wish to be?
A society of strangers or a community of communities?
This is of course an historic question that resonates with words we associate with another cleric the poet John Donne when he offered the idea in Meditation XVII, that we are interconnected, interrelated in our common humanity, that 'no man is an island'.
It's worth quoting:
The Church is Catholic, universal, so are all her actions; all that she does belongs to all. When she baptises a child, that action concerns me; for that child is thereby connected to that body which is my head too, and ingrafted into that body whereof I am a member. And when she buries a man, that action concerns me: all mankind is of one author, and is one volume; and when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and very chapter must be so translated; God employs several translators; some pieces are translated by age, some by sickness, some by war, some by justice; but God's hand is in every translation, and his hand shall bind up all our scattered leaves again for that library where every book shall lie open to one another.
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod is washed away by the sea, Europe is the less.